Creation/Evolution/ID

My Response to “Is the Day-Age View of Genesis Synonymous with Evolution?”

By Ronnie W. Rogers / February 10, 2015 / Comments Off on My Response to “Is the Day-Age View of Genesis Synonymous with Evolution?”

Hello I am assuming that your post is in some way, either a response to or prompted by my article on June 4th entitled A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course. If not, please forgive my unfortunate assumption and therefore my response to your article. Your title “Is the Day-Age View of…

Read More

A Response Regarding: A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Evolution! Part I

By Ronnie W. Rogers / February 2, 2015 / Comments Off on A Response Regarding: A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Evolution! Part I

This is a response to my article published on sbctoday.com, 6/4/14 entitled, A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Evolution! Part I. I also posted this article on this blog, December 22, 2014. I am sorry about the disconnect. This should have been published sooner. I have a…

Read More

A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Darwinism! Part IV

By Ronnie W. Rogers / January 12, 2015 / Comments Off on A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Darwinism! Part IV

This is the last article in this series, which looks at the strengths of interpreting the word “day” in Genesis chapter 1 as a normal lunar day and answers objections to this normal reading of the text. The first three considered strengths of such a reading and this final article considers some problem verses.

Read More

A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Darwinism! Part III

By Ronnie W. Rogers / January 6, 2015 / Comments Off on A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Darwinism! Part III

This is the third part of this series of articles, which looks at the strengths of interpreting the word “day” in Genesis chapter 1 as a normal lunar day. The fourth and final article answers objections to this normal reading of the text. As mentioned in a previous post, any evidence or arguments I make…

Read More

A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Darwinism! Part II

By Ronnie W. Rogers / December 29, 2014 / Comments Off on A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Darwinism! Part II

This is the second part of this series of articles, which looks at the strengths of interpreting the word “day” in Genesis chapter 1 as a normal lunar day. The fourth and final article answers objections to this normal reading of the text. All four parts are numbered consecutively.

Read More

A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Evolution! Part I

By Ronnie W. Rogers / December 22, 2014 / Comments Off on A Day Is a Day Is a Day of Course: Unless That Day Challenges Evolution! Part I

Genesis has been a battleground for some time, and today is no different. This is particularly true of Genesis 1-3, which is the account of the creation and the fall. When I first began studying the Scripture, I recognized the importance of the first eleven chapters of Genesis, but in retrospect I did not fully…

Read More

Is Starlight Travel Time Incompatible with the Biblical Account of Creation? Pt. II

By Ronnie W. Rogers / April 7, 2012 / Comments Off on Is Starlight Travel Time Incompatible with the Biblical Account of Creation? Pt. II

Astrophysicist Jason Lisle provides another explanation for “the distant starlight problem” in his paper Anisotropic Synchrony Convention–A Solution to the Distant Starlight Problem  (see Pt. I for other proposals) He states the problem thusly, “Since light travels a distance of one light year (about 6 trillion miles or 9 trillion kilometers) in one year, it would…

Read More

Is Starlight Travel Time Incompatible with the Biblical Account of Creation? Pt. I

By Ronnie W. Rogers / March 27, 2012 / Comments Off on Is Starlight Travel Time Incompatible with the Biblical Account of Creation? Pt. I

How do those like me who believe in a recent creation and that the days of Genesis chapter one are actual solar (24 hour) days (see my article A Day is A Day) reconcile that with the time scientists say is necessary for starlight to travel to earth? Astrophysicist John Hartnett succinctly states the difficulty…

Read More

Think About IT: Evolution is Short on Information

By Ronnie W. Rogers / February 27, 2012 / Comments Off on Think About IT: Evolution is Short on Information

The key for Darwinian evolution is the increase in information and the transmission of such. For example, the information needed for slime to produce more slime only needs to be sufficiently slimy, but the information needed to transition to a sophisticate is indeed astronomic. “That is, particles-to-people evolution requires changes that increase genetic information (e.g.,…

Read More

Think About IT: The Case of the Missing Rib—SOLVED

By Ronnie W. Rogers / February 18, 2012 / Comments Off on Think About IT: The Case of the Missing Rib—SOLVED

Some skeptics as well as some sincere questioners ask, “If God took a rib from Adam to make Eve, then why don’t men have one less rib than women?” The answer is simply, he would not pass on a lost rib onto the next generation anymore than he would pass on a missing finger, toe,…

Read More