Francis J. Beckwith, a wonderful Christian apologist and former President of The Evangelical Theological Society, has taken his stand with the Roman Catholic Church. I have just a few comments.
Dr. Beckwith is an outstanding Christian scholar, and from what I know about him, quite a gentleman. Consequently, my comments are not intended to be an attack upon the man, but rather his decision and concerns I have with the ETS and Baylor University. Continue reading →
Recently, some of our college students visited Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. Some of them will be attending there in the fall, and others are seeking the Lord’s direction with regard to going to seminary.
As a part of their excursion, they attended classes, chapel and joined Mrs. Patterson at Pecan Manor, the president’s home.
This afforded our students the opportunity to become familiar with one of our great seminaries, and it also provided a stimulus to questions and discussions about the Conservative Resurgence.
Dr. Patterson and Judge Paul Pressler led the charge to call the SBC back to fidelity to the Scripture as the Word of God without error. Even as I write, they continue to be vilified by moderates, liberals and everyone who despises the full counsel of the inerrant Scripture.
Sadly, as in the past, there are those who personally avow their belief in the inerrancy of Scripture, all the while using one reason or another for not taking the necessary steps to actualize the restoration and continuance of biblical fidelity throughout our agencies and on the mission field. In fact, they actually attack those who do have the spiritual courage and fortitude to initiate and maintain the necessary changes. Continue reading →
Christians’ opinions about war cover the continuum from pacifism to patriotism—from no war to any war for the homeland. I think both positions are based upon selective use of biblical teaching.
It is true that God’s perfect world did not have war; however, it is incorrect to conclude from that truth that God is therefore against all war—e.g. a pacifist. We know that God is not a pacifist since He actually led Israel into war e.g. Jericho, Joshua 6; Ai, Joshua 8.
It is true that war is a dreadfully horrid situation. It is the most dreadful of conditions one can imagine except for tyranny and hell; unfortunately, the reality is that in a fallen world it is, at times, the only way to prevent would-be despots from imposing totalitarianism upon every man woman and child. Tyrants view humans as a means rather than an end; consequently, it is perilous indeed to believe that such a malevolent mind could value humane agreements or treaties beyond what is self-serving. Continue reading →
Deacons should play an important role in the life and ministry of the local church, and they very often do. Unfortunately, their New Testament role is often obfuscated by man’s wisdom. In Baptist churches, and other local churches that are similarly structured, the title of deacon can easily become an honor to be bestowed, a trophy of popularity or an insignia of importance; consequently, the deacon ministry easily becomes a ruling body of some sort, which has devastating consequences upon the local church.
The New Testament gives clear qualifications for being a deacon (1 Timothy 3:8-13), but there is scant information concerning their responsibilities, numbers, etc. The only example of men functioning in the role of deacons is Acts 6:1-7, although there is debate whether these seven were actually deacons. Some say they were, while others say they were elders and still others maintain that they were just some men set aside to meet a temporary need. I believe these were deacons, and later the qualifications would be expanded.
Assuming that these seven were the first deacons, we are still left without prescriptive Scripture concerning their responsibilities, yet there are some incredibly important insights to be gleaned from this event in the early life of the church. Let me mention four significant particulars from this passage and the New Testament concerning deacons, which can have a profoundly positive impact upon the deaconate of any church. Continue reading →
The Virginia Tech Massacre last Monday has once again shocked the nation. Here in civilized America, the most technologically advanced society, where man dwells far above the mire of barbarism, a young man commits a most uncivilized act, a heinous betrayal of humanity even by barbaric standards.
Pundits seek someone to blame for not stopping Cho Seung-Hui before he unleashed his nefariousness upon the innocent. All the nation grieves and rightly so. For these young people did not sign up to serve on the front lines of combat. What can a Christian say about this iniquitous rampage: here are a few thoughts. Continue reading →
The KJV has been used mightily of God as His church has proclaimed the wonderful truths of Scripture throughout the world over the nearly pas four hundred years. The Bible is the best seller of all books for all times, and the KJV is the best selling Bible of all times.
The poetic nature of the the KJV accentuates the dignity of Scripture far more than some of the drier modern translations, and many would say that it is far easier to memorize as well.
These and other considerations result in an appreciation for the KJV by even those who do not use it as their primary translation.
Consequently, love and appreciation for the KJV, choosing the KJV as one’s personally preferred translations, or even believeing that it is possible one of the best translations is not a problem. However, there is a problem when, as some do, people say it is the only accurate translation. Supporters of the KJV only translation are dogmatic, sometimes downright atagonistic, but in reality the facts are not on their side. Continue reading →
The number of Bible translations has grown significantly and there seems to be no end in sight. This can be rather confusing for most people since they are, more often than not, unaware of the kinds or purposes of translations and/or what they are based on.
Some Bibles like the New International Version are intended to be easy to read and understand while maintaining fidelity to the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts, which is known as Dynamic Equivalence. Others like the New American Standard Bible are intended to accurately reflect the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts while maintaining a high degree of readability, which is known as Formal Equivalence.
The difference between them is two-fold; first, they are different in emphasis or purpose. Translators are constantly choosing from translations that exist on a continuum between most accurate—the original language—and most readable, which would be the simplest vernacular. The former would maintain accuracy but be unreadable to most, and the latter would be readable to most but dangerously inaccurate.
Second, they differ in regards to what manuscripts they use for their translation. While the King James is a formal translation like the NASB, the translators of the KJV use only some of the ancient manuscripts available; whereas, the NIV and the NASB use all of the available manuscript evidence.
Since the NASB uses all of the available manuscript evidence, is a formal translation, and yet very readable, I recommend that everyone have an NASB for their primary translation or at least for their Bible study. For a more thorough understanding of the differences in translations you can listen to my Messages on “Help!! Which Bible Translation is Right?” or click more for an synopsis. Continue reading →
The following is intended to summarize our two month study on the New Testament teaching about speaking in tongues and modern day claims. I encourage you to listen to the entire series on tongues if you were not present when we studied this together.
The series on tongues is really a part of a larger study of 1 Corinthians 12-14 and other related biblical passages. This study examines these verses in their historical and biblical context.
Continue reading →
Everyone by now is aware of the child abuse that not only went on in the Catholic Church, but was actually covered up by the leaders of the Catholic Church. That immorality and abuses will happen in the church is inevitable since the church, like any other organization, is filled with people who are sinners.
However, it is tragedy of tragedies that the church would cover-up, ignore or minimize sin and particularly this kind of sin. Now a 20/20 exposé has focused upon Protestants and Southern Baptists in particular. Continue reading →
I spoke at Paradigm last Thursday night on the subject of worship. I reminded them that about half of all that the Bible says about worship is condemning false worship. As a matter of fact, the amount of Scripture devoted to false worship, along with the subtlety of false worship, should cause every Christian to approach worship with a healthy amount of fear lest we also become guilty of false worship.
A.W. Tozer, who served thirty-one years as the pastor of Chicago’s Southside Gospel Tabernacle (1928-1959), dedicated himself to calling the Church back to a radical obedience to Christ and warning about the menace of idolatry for civilized man.
In his book, The Knowledge of the Holy, subtitled, “Why We Must Think Rightly about God,” he warns that idolatry, Continue reading →